◔
Cervical Spine Examination: Difference between revisions
From WikiMSK
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
== | ==Sequence== | ||
*Flexion rotation test (FRT) - this passive test assesses movement dysfunction at the C1/2 segment. The C1/2 segment comprises around 60% of the total cervical range of motion regardless of age. By maximally flexing the neck, theoretically all structures below C2 are constrained and therefore have limited ability to contribute to rotation. It has been shown to be accurate and reliable. Range of motion reduces with age by about 4-7 degrees per decade.<ref>Schรคfer, Axel Georg Meender, et al. โUpper Cervical Range of Rotation during the Flexion-Rotation Test Is Age Dependent: An Observational Study.โ Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease, Jan. 2020, [https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1759720X20964139 Full Text]</ref> | ===Standing=== | ||
Look | |||
ย | |||
===Sitting=== | |||
*Look | |||
*Palpation (muscles) | |||
*Gross screening movement | |||
*Sharp Purser | |||
*Neurologic examination | |||
ย | |||
===Supine=== | |||
*Palpation | |||
*Segmental movement | |||
**Flexion rotation test (FRT) - this passive test assesses movement dysfunction at the C1/2 segment. The C1/2 segment comprises around 60% of the total cervical range of motion regardless of age. By maximally flexing the neck, theoretically all structures below C2 are constrained and therefore have limited ability to contribute to rotation. It has been shown to be accurate and reliable. Range of motion reduces with age by about 4-7 degrees per decade.<ref>Schรคfer, Axel Georg Meender, et al. โUpper Cervical Range of Rotation during the Flexion-Rotation Test Is Age Dependent: An Observational Study.โ Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease, Jan. 2020, [https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1759720X20964139 Full Text]</ref> | |||
ย | |||
===Side Lying=== | |||
*Articulation/Segmental mobility | |||
ย | |||
==Reliability and Validity== | |||
===Muscle Tenderness=== | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|+ Kappa scores for tenderness in neck-shoulder region.<ref>{{#pmid:8118085}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
! Site of Tenderness !! No or occasional symptoms !! Disturbing symptoms | |||
|- | |||
| Right Trapezius|| 0.62|| 0.22 | |||
|- | |||
| Left Trapezius || 0.6|| 0.15 | |||
|- | |||
| Right Levator Scapulae|| 0.54|| 0.52 | |||
|- | |||
| Left Levator Scapulae|| 0.24|| 0.42 | |||
|} | |||
ย | |||
===Facet Joint Tenderness=== | |||
The likelihood ratio for tenderness is 3.9<ref>{{#pmid:3.9.8602474}}</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 20:33, 23 May 2021
This article is a stub.
Sequence
Standing
Look
Sitting
- Look
- Palpation (muscles)
- Gross screening movement
- Sharp Purser
- Neurologic examination
Supine
- Palpation
- Segmental movement
- Flexion rotation test (FRT) - this passive test assesses movement dysfunction at the C1/2 segment. The C1/2 segment comprises around 60% of the total cervical range of motion regardless of age. By maximally flexing the neck, theoretically all structures below C2 are constrained and therefore have limited ability to contribute to rotation. It has been shown to be accurate and reliable. Range of motion reduces with age by about 4-7 degrees per decade.[1]
Side Lying
- Articulation/Segmental mobility
Reliability and Validity
Muscle Tenderness
Site of Tenderness | No or occasional symptoms | Disturbing symptoms |
---|---|---|
Right Trapezius | 0.62 | 0.22 |
Left Trapezius | 0.6 | 0.15 |
Right Levator Scapulae | 0.54 | 0.52 |
Left Levator Scapulae | 0.24 | 0.42 |
Facet Joint Tenderness
The likelihood ratio for tenderness is 3.9[3]
References
- โ Schรคfer, Axel Georg Meender, et al. โUpper Cervical Range of Rotation during the Flexion-Rotation Test Is Age Dependent: An Observational Study.โ Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease, Jan. 2020, Full Text
- โ Levoska et al.. Repeatability of measurement of tenderness in the neck-shoulder region by a dolorimeter and manual palpation. The Clinical journal of pain 1993. 9:229-35. PMID: 8118085. DOI.
- โ PubmedParser error: Invalid PMID, please check. (PMID: 3.9.8602474)