Idiopathic Scoliosis: Difference between revisions

From WikiMSK

No edit summary
Line 136: Line 136:
* In analogue equipment provide breast protection. This isn't necessary with digital equipment.
* In analogue equipment provide breast protection. This isn't necessary with digital equipment.


== Prognosis ==
== Curve Progression ==
The determinants of progression are the age and sex of the individual, the stage of pubertal development, the growth potential, the curve pattern and grade at the time of diagnosis.
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+Risk Factors of Curve Progression in Scoliosis<ref>Comité Nacional de Adolescencia SAP, et al. Consenso de escoliosis idiopática del adolescente [Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis]. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2016 Dec 1;114(6):585-594. Spanish. doi: 10.5546/aap.2016.585. PMID: 27869435.</ref>
|+Risk Factors of Curve Progression in Scoliosis<ref>Altaf F, Gibson A, Dannawi Z, Noordeen H. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. BMJ. 2013 Apr 30;346:f2508. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2508. PMID: 23633006.</ref>
!Risk factor of progression
!Risk factor of progression
!Comment
!Comment
|-
|-
|Age
|Age
|The younger the age at diagnosis, the greater the possibility of progression during pubertal growth.
|The younger the age at diagnosis, the greater the possibility of progression at the onset of the adolescent growth spurt
|-
|-
|Sex
|Sex
|Male
|Progression is more common in girls
|-
|-
|Menarche
|Menarche
|Progression is less in the post-menarche period
|Progression is less likely in the post-menarche period
|-
|-
|Remaining skeletal growth
|Remaining skeletal growth
|The greater the skeletal immaturity, the greater the risk of progression
|The greater the skeletal immaturity, the greater the risk of progression.
|-
|-
|Curve pattern
|Curve pattern
|Double curves progress more rapidly, as are left thoracic curves (convex towards the left)
|Double curves have a higher risk of progression compared to single curves. Left thoracic curves (convex towards the left) are also more likely to progress.
|-
|-
|Curve magnitude
|Curve magnitude
|Greater curves progress more rapidly. Curves between 50-70° are most likely to progress in adulthood.
|Greater curves have a higher risk of progression. Curves between 50-70° are most likely to progress in adulthood.
|}
The remaining skeletal growth is determined by rate of growth, age of telarche and menarche, Tanner's stage, Risser's sign, and/or bone age. It should take into account that the primary growth spurt occurs 6-12 months before menarche in Tanner 3 at an average age of 12 in girls, and in Tanner 4 at an average age of 14 in boys.
{| class="wikitable"
|+Risk Percentage of Progression According to Cobb Angle, Sex, and Age
!Initial Curve
!Girls 10-12 years
!Girls 13-15 years
!Girls >15 years
!Boys
|-
|<19°
|25%
|1%
|<1%
|3%
|-
|20-29°
|60%
|40%
|10%
|6%
|-
|30-56°
|90%
|70%
|30%
|
|-
|>60°
|100%
|90%
|
|
|}
|}


== Management ==
== Management ==
Curves up to 25°: observation every 6 months until skeletally mature including sequential photographs, sitting height.


Curves between 25-40°: bracing
=== Overview ===
Standard management options include observation, bracing, and surgery. Considerations include skeletal maturity and the grade of the curve.


Larger curves: surgery
'''Management According to Skeletal Maturity'''


''Skeletal immaturity''
* <25º: physical examination and radiographs every 4-6 months.
* 25º-40º: bracing.
* > 40º or progression despite the orthosis: should consider surgery.
''Intermediate skeletal maturity''
* <20º: clinical observation.
* 20º-30º: radiographs every 6-9 months.
* > 30º: radiographs strictly every 6 months.
* > 45 °: surgery should be considered.
''Skeletal maturity''
* <40º: unspecified.
* > 40º: annual evaluation.
* ≥ 50º or curve in progression: surgery.
{| class="wikitable"
|+Management According to Grade of the Curve<ref>Bueche MJ. Scoliosis and kyphosis. En: Neinstein LS, Gordon CM, Katzman DK, Rosen D, et al, eds. Adolescent Health Care: a practical guide. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.Págs.235-42.</ref>
!Curve
!Therapy
|-
|10-25°
|observation every 6 months until skeletally mature including sequential photographs, sitting height.
|-
|25-30°
|Bracing
|-
|30-40°
|Bracing
|-
|> 40°
|Surgery in skeletally immature patients
|-
|> 50°
|Surgery in skeletally mature patients.
|}
Restrictive lung disease may become a serious health issue with thoracic curves larger than 70°.
Restrictive lung disease may become a serious health issue with thoracic curves larger than 70°.


Line 187: Line 260:
<references/>
<references/>
*Spinal disorders fundamental of diagnosis and treatment - Boos
*Spinal disorders fundamental of diagnosis and treatment - Boos
*Comité Nacional de Adolescencia SAP, et al. Consenso de escoliosis idiopática del adolescente [Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis]. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2016 Dec 1;114(6):585-594. Spanish. doi: 10.5546/aap.2016.585. PMID: 27869435.
{{Reliable sources|synonym1="idiopathic adolescent scoliosis"}}
{{Reliable sources|synonym1="idiopathic adolescent scoliosis"}}
[[Category:Spine]]
[[Category:Spine]]
[[Category:Developmental Disorders]]
[[Category:Developmental Disorders]]

Revision as of 20:11, 23 July 2021

This article is a stub.

Idiopathic Scoliosis is a three dimensional spinal deformity in frontal, sagittal, and axial planes. It is defined as a coronal spinal curvature of at least 10° with rotation of the vertebral bodies and has unknown aetiology.

Epidemiology

Idiopathic scoliosis is the most common structural spinal deformity in children and adolescents. It affects about 2-3% of adolescents, but only 0.1-0.3% for curvatures greater than 30°. The most common scoliosis is a thoracic curve to the right side. The primary age of onset is 10 to 15 years.

With small curves there is an equal prevalence of affected males and females. However there is a female predominance with increasing curve magnitude.

In the infantile form, which presents at 0-3 years of age, there is a predominance in males at 3:2. At 3-6 the female to male ratio is 1:1; at 3-10 it is 2:1 to 4:1; at 10 years the ratio is 8:1.

Aetiology

The exact aetiology is unknown. There appears to be asymmetrical growth of anterior column of the vertebrae with resulting tethering of the posterior elements. The underlying cause for this imbalance of growth is unknown.

There are thought to be genetic factors controlling for scoliosis. This has been indicated by population and twin studies. However no specific gene or genes have been found. There is variable expression and so environmental factors also contribute to the pathogenesis.

There has been interesting research done on platelets as both skeletal muscle and platelets have myosin/actin contractile systems. There is an association with scoliosis and a defective contractile system in platelets.

Calmodulin and melatonin interact with the actin/myosin system with calmodulin regulating calcium influx from the sacroplasmic reticulum and melatonin binding to calmodulin as an antagonist. Research has suggested abnormal levels of these substances in scoliotic individuals.

Classification

Age Based Classification

The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) classifies idiopathic scoliosis based on age

  1. Infantile (IIS): manifests between birth and 3 years of age. It affects more boys than girls, and is related to the supine position of the baby. 70-90% resolve spontaneously
  2. Juvenile (JIS): manifests between 3 and 10 years of age. The incidence is equal in boys and girls, and has the same progression and AIS.
  3. Adolescent (AIS): manifests between 10 years and skeletal maturity. It is more common in women (70%)
  4. Adult: over 18 years: The adult form is differentiated from primary degenerative scoliosis. The adult idiopathic type is an idiopathic scoliosis that was present at the end of growth and has progressive secondary degenerative changes.

Radiological Classification

The SRS classifies a curve as thoracic if the apex is at the T2 to T11/12 disc, thoracolumbar if the apex is at T12 or L1, and lumbar if the apex is at the L1/2 to L4 disc.

King and Lenke are other classification systems. There is a problem with reliability of grading systems.

Clinical Assessment

Red Flags
  • Left thoracic curve
  • Apical kyphosis
  • Rapid curve progression
  • Structural abnormalities such as a hemivertebra
  • Pathological reflexes, radicular pain, foot deformities


History

  • Family history of spinal deformities or spinal disease
  • Age
  • Sexual maturity: Asking about age of menarche and secondary sex characteristics can help ascertain the level of skeletal maturation.
  • Pain: Most adolescents are asymptomatic. However 25% of patients have back pain as their initial presentation, and another 9% develop pain on follow up. Signs of underlying pathology include constant pain, night pain, and radicular pain.
  • Neurological symptoms: Enquire about bladder or bowel dysfunction, as well as intellectual or motor delay
  • Previous illnesses or trauma
  • Psychological distress

General Physical Examination

  • Height: Serial heights helps to determine the peak growth spurt which is a predictor of the degree of curve progression. To calculate this you need to have at least 3 lots of 6 monthly regular measurements. In girls, this value is 9cm / year and occurs on average at 12 years of chronological age. In males it is 10cm / year and occurs on average at 14 years.
  • Stage of sexual maturity: Assess the stage of sexual maturity using the Tanner stage.
  • Skin and musculoskeletal system: Look for cafe au lait spots, subcutaneous nodules, and axillary freckling of neurofibromatosis; hair patches or dimples of spinal dysraphisms; hypermobility of Marfan and Ehlers-Danlos.
  • Pelvic asymmetry: Assess for pelvic malalignment and leg length discrepancies as causes of pseudoscoliosis
  • Neurological examination: Look for pes cavus, limb weakness, reflex asymmetry or absence including cutaneous abdominal reflexes. Patellar and/or Achilles hyperreflexia should raise suspicion of a non-idiopathic cause of scoliosis.
Adam's test with a scoliometer[1]

Spinal Examination

The patient should stand barefoot, with their legs straight, and with an uncovered back that is accessible to the examiner.

From behind observe the following:

  • Shoulder heights
  • Scapula heights
  • Iliac crest heights
  • Plumb line: this should align between the spinous processes of the seventh cervical vertebra and intergluteal line.
  • Symmetry of the triangular space between the medial aspect of each arm with the adjacent trunk.
  • Adam's test: The patient stands and bends forward at the waist with the head as low as possible without flexing the knees until the shoulders are at hip height while holding their arms hanging straight down with palms together in a prayer position. The examiner assesses for symmetry of the back from behind and beside the patient while looking for any back or rib cage abnormalities such as a rib hump.
  • Seated Adam's test: Non-structural causes can be assessed by examining the patient sitting on the bed and bending forward. Structural scoliosis persists in this position, while a non-structural scoliosis (e.g. due to leg length discrepancy) disappears.
  • Measurement of trunk rotation angle: Scoliometer use is ideal but not necessary in primary care. This is an instrument that is placed on the back during the Adams test and is used to provide an objective measure of the curve. A rotation of 5° correlates with a 20° Cobb angle.
  • Assess the scoliotic curve direction. 90% of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves are right thoracic, left lumbar curves, i.e. the curve is convex towards the right.

From a profile view observe the following:

  • Rounded shoulders
  • Abdominal prominence due to poor muscular tone

From the front observe the following:

  • Pectus excavatum or carinatum (Marfan)
  • Asymmetry of breast development

Differential Diagnosis

Child and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis accounts for approximately 80% of cases. It is a diagnosis of exclusion and is differentiated from neuromuscular and congenital scoliosis. In adults degenerative scoliosis is a consideration. Also non-structural causes such as leg-length discrepancy occurs.

Scoliosis Differential Diagnoses
  • Idiopathic Scoliosis
  • Neuromuscular Scoliosis: lower or upper motor neuron diseases, myopathies
  • Syndromic Scoliosis: Marfan, Ehlers-Danlos, osteogenesis imperfecta, neurofibromatosis, osteochondrodysplasia
  • Congenital Scoliosis: vertebral and extraverterbral disorders
  • Adult Degenerative Scoliosis
  • Non-Structural Scoliosis
  • Other: rheumatoid diseases, trauma, bone tumours.

Imaging

Cobb Angle Measurement: The above spine has two offsetting curves, denoted by green and red vertebral bodies. A: line along superior endplate of highest vertebral body, B: line along inferior endplate of lowest vertebral body. C: lines extended forming the Cobb angle. D: for the smaller green curve perpendicular lines are drawn towards each other, with the intersection of these perpendiculars forming the Cobb angle.[2]

Initial radiological investigations should include whole spine radiographs from the cranium to the pelvis, including anteroposterior (or posteroanterior which dramatically reduces radiation) and lateral views. The patient should be standing barefoot with a relaxed trunk to avoid compensating positions. If the patient has difficulty standing then they can be imaged in a semi-sitting position to maintain the effect of gravity on the curves.

Cobb Angle

The magnitude of a scoliotic curve is determined by the Cobb angle. To measure the Cobb angle first identify the "end vertebra" which are the top and bottom-most vertebral bodies in the curve.

Lines are then drawn along the superior endplate of the highest vertebral body and inferior endplate of the lowest vertebral body. The lines are extended until they intersect, and the angle that forms is the Cobb angle.

In smaller curves the angle may be too small to allow intersection using the above method. In that situation extend the lines a short distance, then draw perpendicular lines from each line towards the other line. The angle that forms from the intersection of the perpendiculars is the Cobb angle.

Alignment

Alignment is measured in both the coronal and sagittal planes using a plumb line starting at the base of C7. This needs to be performed on erect full-length spine radiographs without lateral bending

In a neutral coronal balance the C7 plumb line lies within 2cm of the centre of the sacrum. When the C7 plumb line sits to the left of the sacrum there is a negative coronal balance, when it sits to the right there is a positive coronal balance. In the coronal plane the spine should have less than 10° of curvature.

In neutral sagittal balance the C7 plumb line lies within 2cm of the posterior-superior corner of S1. If the C7 plumb line lies anterior to S1 there is a positive sagittal balance, and if it lies posterior to S1 there is a negative sagittal balance. There is a wide range of normal curves in the sagittal plane. The thoracic kyphosis ranges from 10° to 60°, while the lumbar lordosis ranges from 20° to 60°. A positive sagittal balance is associated with worse pain and disability.

Skeletal Maturity

Including the iliac crests allows not only measurement of the pelvic tilt but also bone maturity by Risser's sign. Risser's sign represents the state of ossification of the iliac crests, which begins at the ASIS and progresses back towards the PSIS.

  • Stage 0: no ossification centre at the level of iliac crest apophysis
  • Stage 1: apophysis under 25% of the iliac crest
  • Stage 2: apophysis over 25-50% of the iliac crest
  • Stage 3: apophysis over 50-75% of the iliac crest
  • Stage 4: apophysis over >75% of the iliac crest
  • Stage 5: complete ossification and fusion of the iliac crest apophysis

Grade 5 may not match the completion of vertebral growth. Also stage 0 and stage 5 appear similar. If there are doubts regarding skeletal maturity then request a bone age x-ray.

Radiation Dose

Whole spine radiographs are equivalent to 100 chest x-rays and there is an increased risk of death from breast cancer compared to the general population. The following precautions should be taken

  • Wherever possible radiographs should be done form a posteroanterior projection which reduces the radiation dose to the breasts by 70-80%.
  • Gonadal protection in both sexes
  • In analogue equipment provide breast protection. This isn't necessary with digital equipment.

Curve Progression

The determinants of progression are the age and sex of the individual, the stage of pubertal development, the growth potential, the curve pattern and grade at the time of diagnosis.

Risk Factors of Curve Progression in Scoliosis[3]
Risk factor of progression Comment
Age The younger the age at diagnosis, the greater the possibility of progression at the onset of the adolescent growth spurt
Sex Progression is more common in girls
Menarche Progression is less likely in the post-menarche period
Remaining skeletal growth The greater the skeletal immaturity, the greater the risk of progression.
Curve pattern Double curves have a higher risk of progression compared to single curves. Left thoracic curves (convex towards the left) are also more likely to progress.
Curve magnitude Greater curves have a higher risk of progression. Curves between 50-70° are most likely to progress in adulthood.

The remaining skeletal growth is determined by rate of growth, age of telarche and menarche, Tanner's stage, Risser's sign, and/or bone age. It should take into account that the primary growth spurt occurs 6-12 months before menarche in Tanner 3 at an average age of 12 in girls, and in Tanner 4 at an average age of 14 in boys.

Risk Percentage of Progression According to Cobb Angle, Sex, and Age
Initial Curve Girls 10-12 years Girls 13-15 years Girls >15 years Boys
<19° 25% 1% <1% 3%
20-29° 60% 40% 10% 6%
30-56° 90% 70% 30%
>60° 100% 90%

Management

Overview

Standard management options include observation, bracing, and surgery. Considerations include skeletal maturity and the grade of the curve.

Management According to Skeletal Maturity

Skeletal immaturity

  • <25º: physical examination and radiographs every 4-6 months.
  • 25º-40º: bracing.
  • > 40º or progression despite the orthosis: should consider surgery.

Intermediate skeletal maturity

  • <20º: clinical observation.
  • 20º-30º: radiographs every 6-9 months.
  • > 30º: radiographs strictly every 6 months.
  • > 45 °: surgery should be considered.

Skeletal maturity

  • <40º: unspecified.
  • > 40º: annual evaluation.
  • ≥ 50º or curve in progression: surgery.
Management According to Grade of the Curve[4]
Curve Therapy
10-25° observation every 6 months until skeletally mature including sequential photographs, sitting height.
25-30° Bracing
30-40° Bracing
> 40° Surgery in skeletally immature patients
> 50° Surgery in skeletally mature patients.

Restrictive lung disease may become a serious health issue with thoracic curves larger than 70°.

Surgery

The goal of surgery is prevention of curve progression and correction of the deformity. It usually involves curve correction and spinal instrumentation and fusion. The lower lumbar motion segments tend to be left unfused.

Gallery

See Also

References

  1. Ma, Hsuan-Hsiao et al. “Application of two-parameter scoliometer values for predicting scoliotic Cobb angle.” Biomedical engineering online vol. 16,1 136. 4 Dec. 2017, doi:10.1186/s12938-017-0427-7
  2. Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Orthopaedia.com. Available from https://orthopaedia.com/page/Adolescent-Idiopathic-Scoliosis
  3. Altaf F, Gibson A, Dannawi Z, Noordeen H. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. BMJ. 2013 Apr 30;346:f2508. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2508. PMID: 23633006.
  4. Bueche MJ. Scoliosis and kyphosis. En: Neinstein LS, Gordon CM, Katzman DK, Rosen D, et al, eds. Adolescent Health Care: a practical guide. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.Págs.235-42.
  • Spinal disorders fundamental of diagnosis and treatment - Boos
  • Comité Nacional de Adolescencia SAP, et al. Consenso de escoliosis idiopática del adolescente [Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis]. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2016 Dec 1;114(6):585-594. Spanish. doi: 10.5546/aap.2016.585. PMID: 27869435.

Literature Review