Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: Difference between revisions

From WikiMSK

No edit summary
Line 54: Line 54:
* Zeisig et al usedh grey-scale ultrasonography and colour doppler in 17 patients in a total of 22 elbows, and compared them to 11 controls with 22 pain-free elbows. In 21/22 of the painful elbows, vascularity was shown. This was in contrast to only 2/22 of pain-free elbows. This was thought to correspond to vasculo-neural growth.<ref>Zeisig E, Ohberg L, Alfredson H. Extensor origin vascularity related to pain in patients with Tennis elbow. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(7):659-663. doi:10.1007/s00167-006-0060-7</ref>
* Zeisig et al usedh grey-scale ultrasonography and colour doppler in 17 patients in a total of 22 elbows, and compared them to 11 controls with 22 pain-free elbows. In 21/22 of the painful elbows, vascularity was shown. This was in contrast to only 2/22 of pain-free elbows. This was thought to correspond to vasculo-neural growth.<ref>Zeisig E, Ohberg L, Alfredson H. Extensor origin vascularity related to pain in patients with Tennis elbow. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(7):659-663. doi:10.1007/s00167-006-0060-7</ref>
* Tendonosis can be induced in the contralateral limb with unilateral overloading in one rabbit model of achilles tendinopathy<ref>Andersson G, Forsgren S, Scott A, et al. Tenocyte hypercellularity and vascular proliferation in a rabbit model of tendinopathy: contralateral effects suggest the involvement of central neuronal mechanisms. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(5):399-406. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2009.068122</ref>
* Tendonosis can be induced in the contralateral limb with unilateral overloading in one rabbit model of achilles tendinopathy<ref>Andersson G, Forsgren S, Scott A, et al. Tenocyte hypercellularity and vascular proliferation in a rabbit model of tendinopathy: contralateral effects suggest the involvement of central neuronal mechanisms. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(5):399-406. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2009.068122</ref>
==Imaging==
Ultrasound and MRI have high sensitivity but limited specificity. Features seen on imaging include tendon thickening, focal areas of tendon hypo-echogenicity (US), decreased signal intensity (MRI). One meta-analysis of MRI studies found signal changes in 90% of affected and 50% of unaffected tendons <ref>Pasternack I et al. MR findings in humeral epicondylitis. A systematic review. Acta Radiol. 2001;42:434-440.</ref>. Diagnostic ultrasound by an examiner blinded to status found tendinopathic changes in 90% of patients and 53% of asymptomatic controls<ref>Heales LJ et al. Diagnostic ultrasound imaging for lateral epicondylalgia: a caseโ€“control study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46:2070-2076.</ref>.
It is important to note that most studies find a lack of association between the severity of tendon changes on imaging and symptoms in lateral elbow tendinopathy. However one study demonstrated that the presence of a lateral collateral tear and the size of any intrasubstance tendon tear detected by ultrasound is significantly associated with poorer prognosis in patients with lateral elbow pain<ref>Clarke AW et al. Lateral elbow tendinopathy: correlation of ultrasound findings with pain and functional disability. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1209-1214.</ref>


==Diagnosis==
==Diagnosis==

Revision as of 08:20, 21 June 2020

Definition

There is no formal definition. It is generally described as pain at the tendon insertion or myotendinous junction during loading of the wrist extensor muscles. Lateral elbow tendinopathy is also commonly called tennis elbow, lateral epicondylitis, lateral epicondylalgia, and elbow tendinosis/tendinitis.

Epidemiology

Lateral elbow tendinopathy is the most common cause of lateral elbow pain.

The prevalence was 1.3% in an observational study of 5871 working-age Finns [1]. The peak prevalence in females is in the 5th decade. The annual incidence is 4.23 per 1000 [2].

Risk Factors

Common risk factors are summarised below [1]

  • Smoking
  • Obesity
  • Age 45-54
  • Repetitive movements especially wrist extension and supination for at least two hours daily
  • Forceful activity (lifting loads over 20kg)
  • New or sudden overuse of tendon (e.g. lifting a new baby, new exercise routine, new gardening, handling heavy tools or heavy load)
  • Low job control
  • Low social support

The highest load at the ECRB tendon is when the elbow is extended and teh forearm pronated.

Doesn't increase risk: keyboard use, working with arms above shoulder-height, exposure to hand-transmitted vibrations

Poor prognostic factors[3]

  • High work physical strain
  • Dominant side
  • Neck pain
  • Symptoms greater than 3 months
  • Severe Pain

Note: Tennis is associated with the condition in less than 10 in 100 patients, and is more common in recreational players. See Hatch et al for discussion about racket grip sizes. [4]

Natural History

It is often described as a self limiting condition. A โ€œwait and seeโ€ approach can see improvement within one year [5][6]. A third of patients have prolonged discomfort lasting in excess of 1 year despite interventions. 5% of patients do not respond to conservative physical interventions and undergo surgery.

Pathogenesis

It is generally stated that the extensor carpi radialis brevis tendon is the structure most commonly implicated. The extensor digitorum or extensor carpi ulnaris may be the culprit if middle finger extension is more painful than wrist extension [7]

Factors thought to be relevant:

  • Repeated microtearing and healing attempts
  • Non inflammatory "angiofibroblastic hyperplasia" also known as "neovessels" or simply "angiogenesis"
  • Formation of nonfunctional blood vessels
  • Collagen scaffold disrupted by fibroblasts and vascular granulation
  • Abnormal tissue has a large number of nociceptive nerve fibres.
  • Tearing may be primary with degenerative change being secondary or vice versa.

Central neural mechanisms may be at play. Those with affected tendons tend to grip in a flexed wrist position, even with their unaffected side. There is also a bilateral reduction in speed and reaction time. [8]

Pathology Studies Pathology studies have generally been histological in those undergoing surgery and imaging based.

  • Chard et al harvested 20 common extensor tendons in patients having a release procedure, and compared them to nine control biopsies, and performed an unblinded assessment. Common changes were glycosaminoglycan infiltration, new bone formation, fibrofatty change, partial rupture, and fibrocartilage formation. Inflammatory changes were only found in one sample [9]
  • Regan et al undertook a similar smaller study with a blinded assessment. They corroborated the lack of inflammation, but did see hyaline degradation in all samples. They also noted vascular proliferation, fibroblastic proliferation, and calcific debris in some speciments.[10]
  • Maufulli et al did an non-controlled ultrasound studyOne study looked at using high definition ultrasound studies in patients with the syndrome of lateral epicondylitis[11]
  • Zeisig et al usedh grey-scale ultrasonography and colour doppler in 17 patients in a total of 22 elbows, and compared them to 11 controls with 22 pain-free elbows. In 21/22 of the painful elbows, vascularity was shown. This was in contrast to only 2/22 of pain-free elbows. This was thought to correspond to vasculo-neural growth.[12]
  • Tendonosis can be induced in the contralateral limb with unilateral overloading in one rabbit model of achilles tendinopathy[13]

Imaging

Ultrasound and MRI have high sensitivity but limited specificity. Features seen on imaging include tendon thickening, focal areas of tendon hypo-echogenicity (US), decreased signal intensity (MRI). One meta-analysis of MRI studies found signal changes in 90% of affected and 50% of unaffected tendons [14]. Diagnostic ultrasound by an examiner blinded to status found tendinopathic changes in 90% of patients and 53% of asymptomatic controls[15].

It is important to note that most studies find a lack of association between the severity of tendon changes on imaging and symptoms in lateral elbow tendinopathy. However one study demonstrated that the presence of a lateral collateral tear and the size of any intrasubstance tendon tear detected by ultrasound is significantly associated with poorer prognosis in patients with lateral elbow pain[16]

Diagnosis

  • Onset of pain is insidious
  • Can be diagnosed using the "Southampton examination schedule"[17]
    • All three of epicondylar pain, epicondylar tenderness, pain on resisted extension of the wrist
    • Fairly accurate - sensitivity 73%, specificity 97%, kappa = 0.75
  • Often also get pain with supination of the forearm, resisted third finger extension (with an extended elbow), pain on lifting a chair with a pronated hand.
  • Can get wrist extension weakness
  • Range of motion usually normal
  • Imaging usually unnecessary, and extend of tendon damage is not correlated with the amount of pain. May be considered if no improvement.


Reproduction of lateral elbow pain during manual palpation and/or active, passive, or combined movements of the cervical spine should raise suspicion of radicular or referred pain[18]

  • Neurological examination if indicated (radial nerve function, sensitisation)
    • Radial nerve neurodynamic testing: A positive test requires reproduction of the patientโ€™s lateral elbow pain and alteration of symptoms by a sensitization manoeuver, such as cervical lateral flexion or scapular elevation
    • Clinical ice pain test: Pain intensity of more than 5/10, after 10 seconds of ice application indicates 90% likelihood of cold hyperalgesia

Differential Diagnoses

Lateral Elbow Pain

  • Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy
  • Referred pain (Cervical spine, Upper thoracic spine, Myofascial)
  • Synovitis of the radiohumeral joint
  • Radiohumeral bursitis
  • Radial Head Fractures
  • Radial Head Dislocation
  • Capitellar Osteochondritis Dissecans (Capitellum, Radius in adolescents)
  • Capitellar Osteochondrosis
  • Lateral Condyle Fracture
  • Capitellum Fracture
  • Lateral Collateral Ligament Complex Injury
  • Radial Head Subluxation (Nursemaid Elbow)
  • Radiocapitellar Osteoarthrosis
  • Bone Neoplasm
  • Soft Tissue Neoplasm
  • Posterolateral Rotary Instability
  • Posterior Interosseous Nerve Entrapment or Radial Neuropathy at the Spiral Groove
  • Posterolateral Plica Syndrome

Medial Elbow Pain

  • Medial Elbow Tendinopathy
  • Medial collateral ligament injury (acute and chronic)
  • Ulnar neuritis
  • Avulsion fracture of the medial epicondyle (children and adolescents)
  • Apophysitis (children and adolescents)
  • Referred pain (Cervical Radicular Pain, somatic referred myofascial pain)
  • Myofascial pain
  • Ulnar Neuropathy
  • Little Leaguer's Elbow
  • Triceps Tendinopathy and rupture
  • Fractures (Olecranon Fracture, Pediatric Medial Epicondyle Avulsion, Coronoid Process Fracture, Medial Condyle Fracture)
  • Medial epitrochlear lymphadenopathy (e.g. from cat-scratch disease)
  • Anconeus Epitrochlearis
  • Cyst, Mass, Foreign Body

Posterior Elbow Pain

Anterior Elbow Pain

Generalised

  • Osteoarthritis
  • If locking consider chondromalacia, osteochondritis, loose bodies

Treatment

Doing Nothing

  • Most patients recover at one year with or without treatment

Exercises

Effective exercise programmes incorporate progressive eccentric and isometric strengthening. Flexibility training may also be required. Eccentric exercise can be performed by holding a weight or a taut resistance band with the wrist extended. The wrist is then flexed against resistance.

There are inconsistencies in the methodological quality of research into eccentric strengthening for this condition. High quality research in other tendinopathies, in particular achilles tendinopathy, has shown benefit for including eccentric strengthening in a rehabilitation programme. One systematic review in 2003 showed mixed results. [19]. A more recent review in 2014 found three high quality studies, seven medium quality studies, and two low quality studies. They concluded that the evidence supports the inclusion of eccentric strengthening as part of a multimodal approach to rehabilitation[20]

Some of the better quality studies:

  • Standard physical therapy versus standard therapy plus eccentric stregnthening. Patients in the eccentric strengthening group had marked reductions in pain, disability, and improvement in tendon appearance on ultrasound at one month. At completion the eccentric training group had no strength deficit. [21]
  • A similar smaller study found better outcomes in the eccentric strengthening group when using a rubber bar: File:rubber bar lateral elbow.jpg .[22]

Rest

  • Rest, avoid or alter activities responsible for symptoms

Activity Modification

  • For tennis players: lighter racket with smaller grip and less string tension, use 2 - handed backhand

Orthotics

  • braces, forearm straps, wrist cock-up splints may reduce pain and improve function (level 2)
  • Counter-force brace recommended as inexpensive and easy to use. Apply 6-10cm distal to elbow joint.

Medication

  • topical NSAIDs may help, inconsistent evidence for oral NSAIDs (level 2)
  • topical GTN may help for patients having physical therapy (level 2)

PRP

  • Injection platelet rich plasma (level 2)

Surgery

Surgery generally involved excision of the degenerative tissue, and release of the tendon from the lateral epicondyle. There are no placebo controlled trials evaluating surgery for this condition.

Steroid injections

Peritendinous steroid injections may provide short-term relief (up to 12 weeks), but result in increased pain and recurrence at one year (level 1)

Complete recovery or much improvement at Normal Steroid Physio Steroid+Physio
4 weeks 10% 71% 39% 68%
26 weeks 83% 56% 89% 54%
52 weeks 93% 84% 100% 82%
recurrence at 52w 20% 55% 5% 54%

Stretching

Stretching is not recommended due to the compressive loads placed on the tendon.

Acupuncture

References

  1. โ†‘ 1.0 1.1 Shiri R, Viikari-Juntura E, Varonen H, Heliรถvaara M. Prevalence and determinants of lateral and medial epicondylitis: a population study. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164(11):1065-1074. doi:10.1093/aje/kwj325
  2. โ†‘ Walker-Bone K et al. Prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb in the general population. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:642-651.
  3. โ†‘ Smidt N, Lewis M, VAN DER Windt DA, Hay EM, Bouter LM, Croft P. Lateral epicondylitis in general practice: course and prognostic indicators of outcome. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(10):2053-2059.
  4. โ†‘ Hatch GF 3rd, Pink MM, Mohr KJ, Sethi PM, Jobe FW. The effect of tennis racket grip size on forearm muscle firing patterns. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(12):1977-1983. doi:10.1177/0363546506290185
  5. โ†‘ Bisset L et al. Conservative treatments for tennis elbowโ€”do subgroups of patients respond differently? Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007;46:1601-1605.
  6. โ†‘ Smidt N et al. Lateral epicondylitis in general practice: course and prognostic indicators of outcome. J Rheumatol. 2006;33:2053-2059.
  7. โ†‘ Fairbank SM, Corlett RJ. The role of the extensor digitorum communis muscle in lateral epicondylitis. J Hand Surg Br. 2002;27(5):405-409. doi:10.1054/jhsb.2002.0761
  8. โ†‘ Bisset LM, Russell T, Bradley S, Ha B, Vicenzino BT. Bilateral sensorimotor abnormalities in unilateral lateral epicondylalgia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(4):490-495. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.029
  9. โ†‘ Chard MD, Cawston TE, Riley GP, Gresham GA, Hazleman BL. Rotator cuff degeneration and lateral epicondylitis: a comparative histological study. Ann Rheum Dis 1994; 53:30-34
  10. โ†‘ Regan W, Wold LE, Coonrad RW, Morrey BF. Microscopic histopathology of chronic refractory lateral epicondylitis. Am J Sports Med 1992; 20:746-749.
  11. โ†‘ Maffulli N, Regine R, Carrillo F, Capasso G, Minelli S. Tennis elbow: an ultrasonographic study in tennis players. Br J Sports Med 1990; 24:151-155.
  12. โ†‘ Zeisig E, Ohberg L, Alfredson H. Extensor origin vascularity related to pain in patients with Tennis elbow. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(7):659-663. doi:10.1007/s00167-006-0060-7
  13. โ†‘ Andersson G, Forsgren S, Scott A, et al. Tenocyte hypercellularity and vascular proliferation in a rabbit model of tendinopathy: contralateral effects suggest the involvement of central neuronal mechanisms. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(5):399-406. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2009.068122
  14. โ†‘ Pasternack I et al. MR findings in humeral epicondylitis. A systematic review. Acta Radiol. 2001;42:434-440.
  15. โ†‘ Heales LJ et al. Diagnostic ultrasound imaging for lateral epicondylalgia: a caseโ€“control study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46:2070-2076.
  16. โ†‘ Clarke AW et al. Lateral elbow tendinopathy: correlation of ultrasound findings with pain and functional disability. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1209-1214.
  17. โ†‘ Palmer K, Walker-Bone K, Linaker C, et al. The Southampton examination schedule for the diagnosis of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000;59(1):5-11. doi:10.1136/ard.59.1.5
  18. โ†‘ [Wainner RS et al. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination and patient self-report measures for cervical radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28:52-62.
  19. โ†‘ Smidt N, Assendelft WJ, Arola H, et al. Effectiveness of physiotherapy for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review. Ann Med. 2003;35(1):51-62. doi:10.1080/07853890310004138
  20. โ†‘ Cullinane FL, Boocock MG, Trevelyan FC. Is eccentric exercise an effective treatment for lateral epicondylitis? A systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(1):3-19. doi:10.1177/0269215513491974
  21. โ†‘ Croisier JL, Foidart-Dessalle M, Tinant F, Crielaard JM, Forthomme B. An isokinetic eccentric programme for the management of chronic lateral epicondylar tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med. 2007;41(4):269-275. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2006.033324
  22. โ†‘ Tyler TF, Thomas GC, Nicholas SJ, McHugh MP. Addition of isolated wrist extensor eccentric exercise to standard treatment for chronic lateral epicondylosis: a prospective randomized trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(6):917-922. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.04.041