Portal:EBQ: Difference between revisions
From WikiMSK
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This journal club section is inspired by [https://libguides.csu.edu.au CATs], [https://www.wikem.org/wiki/Category:EBQ WikEM.org], [https://www.wikijournalclub.org/ Wiki Journal Club], and [https://bestbets.org Best Evidence Based Topics]. The main articles in the wiki are narrative reviews. This section allows for producing articles with less risk of bias. There are two types of reviews: | This journal club section is inspired by [https://libguides.csu.edu.au CATs], [https://www.wikem.org/wiki/Category:EBQ WikEM.org], [https://www.wikijournalclub.org/ Wiki Journal Club], and [https://bestbets.org Best Evidence Based Topics]. The main articles in the wiki are narrative reviews. This section allows for producing articles with less risk of bias. There are two types of reviews: | ||
# '''Single | # '''Single Journal Article Review''': This follows the [https://www.wikijournalclub.org/ Wiki Journal Club] format. It is a summary and critique of a single seminal journal article in the field of pain and musculoskeletal medicine. | ||
# '''Critically Appraised Topic (CAT)''': Review of the literature on a focused question, where it would be too much information for the relevant normal article on the topic or condition. This follows the [https://libguides.csu.edu.au CAT] format. It is a much more limited version of a systematic review. See the literature on [[:Media:Analysis of 14 review types - Grant 2009.pdf|different review types]] and [[:Media:Critically Appraised Topics in Veterinary Medicine - Brennan 2020.pdf|CATs]]. A good example of a CAT database is the [https://bestbets.org Best Evidence Based Topics]. | # '''Critically Appraised Topic (CAT)''': Review of the literature on a focused question, where it would be too much information for the relevant normal article on the topic or condition. This follows the [https://libguides.csu.edu.au CAT] format. It is a much more limited version of a systematic review. See the literature on [[:Media:Analysis of 14 review types - Grant 2009.pdf|different review types]] and [[:Media:Critically Appraised Topics in Veterinary Medicine - Brennan 2020.pdf|CATs]]. A good example of a CAT database is the [https://bestbets.org Best Evidence Based Topics]. | ||
Revision as of 09:04, 26 March 2022
Evidence Based Questions
This journal club section is inspired by CATs, WikEM.org, Wiki Journal Club, and Best Evidence Based Topics. The main articles in the wiki are narrative reviews. This section allows for producing articles with less risk of bias. There are two types of reviews:
- Single Journal Article Review: This follows the Wiki Journal Club format. It is a summary and critique of a single seminal journal article in the field of pain and musculoskeletal medicine.
- Critically Appraised Topic (CAT): Review of the literature on a focused question, where it would be too much information for the relevant normal article on the topic or condition. This follows the CAT format. It is a much more limited version of a systematic review. See the literature on different review types and CATs. A good example of a CAT database is the Best Evidence Based Topics.
Critically Appraised Topics
no pages or subcategories
