Portal:EBQ: Difference between revisions

From WikiMSK

No edit summary
No edit summary
ย 
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Portal Heading|Evidence Based Questions|lavender|[[File:EBQs.png|60px]]}}
{{Portal Heading|Evidence Based Questions|lavender|[[File:EBQs.png|60px]]}}


This section is inspired by [https://libguides.csu.edu.au CAT], [https://www.wikem.org/wiki/Category:EBQ WikEM.org], [https://www.wikijournalclub.org/ Wiki Journal Club], and [https://bestbets.org Best Evidence Based Topics]. It is effectively a journal club section. There are two types of reviews:
This journal club section is inspired by [https://libguides.csu.edu.au CATs], [https://www.wikem.org/wiki/Category:EBQ WikEM.org], [https://www.wikijournalclub.org/ Wiki Journal Club], and [https://bestbets.org Best Evidence Based Topics]. The main articles in the wiki are narrative reviews. This section allows for producing articles with less risk of bias. There are two types of reviews:


# '''Single journal article review''': This follows the [https://www.wikijournalclub.org/ Wiki Journal Club] format. It is an in depth review of a single seminal journal article.
# '''Single Journal Article''': This follows the [https://www.wikijournalclub.org/ Wiki Journal Club] format. It is a summary and critique of a single seminal journal article in the field of pain and musculoskeletal medicine.
# '''Critically Appraised Topic (CAT)''': Review of the literature on a focused question, where it would be too much information for the relevant normal article on the topic or condition. This follows the [https://bestbets.org Best Evidence Based Topics] or [https://libguides.csu.edu.au CAT] format.
# '''Critically Appraised Topic (CAT)''': Review of the literature on a focused question, where it would be too much information for the relevant normal article on the topic or condition. This follows the [https://libguides.csu.edu.au CAT] format. It is a much more limited version of a systematic review. See the literature on [[:Media:Analysis of 14 review types - Grant 2009.pdf|different review types]] and [[:Media:Critically Appraised Topics in Veterinary Medicine - Brennan 2020.pdf|CATs]]. A good example of a CAT database is the [https://bestbets.org Best Evidence Based Topics]. ย 


{{Card flex 2|
{{Card
{{Card
|card-title=Full EBQ List
|card-title=Single Articles
|card-title-background-color=#BCD8D8
|card-title-background-color=#BCD8D8
|card-title-color=black
|card-title-color=black
|card-text=<categorytree mode="pages">EBQ</categorytree>
|card-text=
}}
ย 
ย 
{{Card flex 2|
<inputbox>
<inputbox>
type=create
type=create
buttonlabel=Create an EBQ page to allow for multiple studies
buttonlabel=Create single article review page
placeholder=Enter the question here
placeholder=Enter the study name here
preload=MediaWiki:Preload-CAT
preload=MediaWiki:Preload-EBQ-single
useve=true
useve=true
</inputbox>
</inputbox>
<hr>
<categorytree mode="pages">Single Articles</categorytree>
}}
{{Card
|card-title=Critically Appraised Topics
|card-title-background-color=#BCD8D8
|card-title-color=black
|card-text=
<inputbox>
<inputbox>
type=create
type=create
buttonlabel=Create an EBQย  page for review of a single paper
buttonlabel=Create a Critically Appraised Topic
placeholder=Enter the study name here
placeholder=Enter the question here
preload=MediaWiki:Preload-EBQ-single
preload=MediaWiki:Preload-CAT
useve=true
useve=true
</inputbox>
</inputbox>
<hr>
<categorytree mode="pages">Critically Appraised Topics</categorytree>
}}
}}
}}


{{PortalToC}}
{{PortalToC}}
[[Category:Portals]]

Latest revision as of 11:33, 2 April 2022

EBQs.png
Evidence Based Questions

This journal club section is inspired by CATs, WikEM.org, Wiki Journal Club, and Best Evidence Based Topics. The main articles in the wiki are narrative reviews. This section allows for producing articles with less risk of bias. There are two types of reviews:

  1. Single Journal Article: This follows the Wiki Journal Club format. It is a summary and critique of a single seminal journal article in the field of pain and musculoskeletal medicine.
  2. Critically Appraised Topic (CAT): Review of the literature on a focused question, where it would be too much information for the relevant normal article on the topic or condition. This follows the CAT format. It is a much more limited version of a systematic review. See the literature on different review types and CATs. A good example of a CAT database is the Best Evidence Based Topics.
Critically Appraised Topics


no pages or subcategories


Portals

Regions ยท Concepts ยท Procedures ยท DDX ยท Cases ยท EBQs ยท Links ยท Training

Note:Training portal is restricted to trainees and fellows.