Dermatomes: Difference between revisions

From WikiMSK

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


[[File:dermatome map lee.PNG]]
[[File:dermatome map lee.PNG]]
Radicular pain does not necessarily follow dermatomal distribution.<ref>{{#pmid:29800710}}</ref>
==History==
==History==
See Downs et al on the history of dermatome maps.<ref>{{#pmid:21628826}}</ref>
See Downs et al on the history of dermatome maps.<ref>{{#pmid:21628826}}</ref>
Line 12: Line 15:


[[Category:Pain Maps]]
[[Category:Pain Maps]]
[[Category:Spine]]
[[Category:Spine]]
[[Category:Stubs]]
[[Category:Stubs]]

Revision as of 20:01, 14 August 2020

This article is a stub.

The most up to date dermatome map is probably that published by Lee et al. They created a composite image taken from published data that they thought was the most reliable. [1] The winding band like dermatomal map seen in some textbooks was from Keegan and Garrett is the most flawed of all dermatomal maps and was not included. Lee et al's map is most consistent tactile dermatomal regions for each spinal dorsal nerve root. The midline has minimal overlap, but otherwise there is extensive and variable overlap. Blank areas on the map represent areas where there is very large degree of variability and overlap. The S3, S4, and S5 cutaneous supply is not shown.

Dermatome map lee.PNG

Radicular pain does not necessarily follow dermatomal distribution.[2]

History

See Downs et al on the history of dermatome maps.[3]

Videos

  1. Lee et al.. An evidence-based approach to human dermatomes. Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) 2008. 21:363-73. PMID: 18470936. DOI.
  2. Furman & Johnson. Induced lumbosacral radicular symptom referral patterns: a descriptive study. The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society 2019. 19:163-170. PMID: 29800710. DOI.
  3. Downs & Laporte. Conflicting dermatome maps: educational and clinical implications. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy 2011. 41:427-34. PMID: 21628826. DOI.