Scaphoid Fracture
Epidemiology
Most commonly in men aged 15-25.
- Waist area: 60-85%
- Distal third: 25%
- Proximal third: 5-15%
Clinical Assessment
Scaphoid fracture usually results from fall onto an outstretched hand generally during a sports-related event. The patient describes radial-sided pain but there may be relatively little pain.
| Test and Study Quality | Description and Positive Findings | Population | Reference Standard | Sensitivity | Specificity | + LR | - LR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snuffbox tenderness[2] | Examiner palpates anatomic
snuffbox. Positive if pain is elicited |
85 patients
presenting to emergency department with mechanism of injury suggesting possible scaphoid fracture |
Radiographic
confirmation of scaphoid fracture |
100% | 98% | 50.0 | 0.0 |
| Pain with resisted
supination[2] |
Examiner holds patient’s
hand in handshake position and directs patient to resist supination of forearm. Positive if pain is elicited |
100% | 98% | 50.0 | 0.0 | ||
| Pain with
longitudinal compression of thumb[2] |
Examiner holds patient’s
thumb and applies long-axis compression through metacarpal bone into scaphoid. Positive if pain is elicited |
98% | 98% | 49.0 | 0.02 | ||
| Anatomic snuffbox tenderness[3] | Examiner palpates anatomic
snuffbox. Positive if pain is elicited |
221 patients with a
suspected scaphoid injury |
100% | 29% | 1.41 | 0.0 | |
| Scaphoid tubercle tenderness[3] | Examiner applies pressure
to scaphoid tubercle. Positive if pain is elicited |
83% | 51% | 1.69 | 0.33 | ||
| Scaphoid compression tenderness[3] | Examiner holds patient’s
thumb and applies long axis compression through metacarpal bone into scaphoid. Positive if pain is elicited |
100% | 80% | 5.0 | 0.0 |
Imaging
The international standard appears to be early MRI in the presence of clinical features and a normal radiograph, or CT if MRI is not available. In New Zealand neither of these imaging modalities is available in primary care. MRI is preferred due to to its superior sensitivity and sensitivity, and also as it can pick up other injuries.
In some areas there may be rapid access to a specialist clinic. Otherwise the patient should be offered a private MRI.
Treatment
The lack of availability of MRI or CT in primary care in New Zealand has implication on management. If the patient is not able to access early MRI, the standard practice is treat any FOOSH injury with scaphoid tenderness in spite of a normal radiograph as a possible fracture, and immobilise in POP for 10 days.
If there is no MRI available then review in 10-14 days and organise a follow up x-ray.
The initial immobilisation method of a diagnosed fracture is either a split scaphoid cast or a backslab. There should be slight palmar flexion and radial deviation. Do not include the thumb
lab. Have slight palmar flexion and radial deviation - the thumb is not included.
Further management depends on the type of fracture:
- Mid-waist or distal fracture: Below elbow cast without the thumb. At one week change to fibreglass if POP was used initially. At 6 weeks remove the cast and x-ray. If the patient is still uncomfortable then request a CT to assess healing.
- Scaphoid tubercle fracture: Below elbow cast for 4-5 weeks for comfort. Non-urgent orthopaedic assessment is recommended.
- Proximal scaphoid fracture: Consider surgery if displacement of 1mm or more
If there is a partial scapholunate ligament injury or extrinsic dorsal ligamentous injury then treat with a compression bandage and refer for physiotherapy for splinting and rehabilitation.
If there is complete scapholunate ligament rupture (scapholunate dissociation) then refer to orthopaedics for consideration of surgery. In this condition there is a gap between the scaphoid and lunate of ≥ 3 mm. A clenched fist view can be used to confirm.
Hand physiotherapy should be offered following scaphoid injuries.
Prognosis
Incorrect management can lead to delayed union, non-union, or avascular necrosis. Delayed union or non-union is usually due to delayed or inadequate stabilisation, but can also be due to fracture instability.
Further Reading
- Clementson et al 2020[4].
References
- ↑ Cleland, Joshua, Shane Koppenhaver, and Frank H. Netter. Netter's orthopaedic clinical examination : an evidence-based approach. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders/Elsevier, 2011.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Waeckerle JF. A prospective study identifying the sensitivity of radiographic findings and the efficacy of clinical findings in carpal navicular fractures. Ann Emerg Med. 1987;16:733-737
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Grover R. Clinical assessment of scaphoid injuries and the detection of fractures. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1996;21:341-343
- ↑ Clementson et al.. Acute scaphoid fractures: guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. EFORT open reviews 2020. 5:96-103. PMID: 32175096. DOI. Full Text.
