WikiMSK:Peer Review Process
Content may be published in an unfinished form, and this is encouraged. Articles have an indicator on the top right as to the level of completeness. Quarter circles are called stubs, half circles are partially finished, and three quarter circles are complete. The aim is for complete articles to be peer reviewed, and these articles are indicated with a green circle, with the date of review, and a box with the peer review details at the top. These articles may still be changed, but readers can refer back to the older version that was reviewed.
None of the authors, contributors, sponsors, administrators, or anyone else connected with WikiMSK in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate information or for your use of the information contained in or linked from these web pages.
User Accounts
- Editing users’ identity and credentials - All applicants are verified as being eligible (members of NZAMM) by the lead editor. The NZAMM has a detailed vetting process for membership which requires relevant credentials. It is up to the user whether they want to publicly display their full name and details in their user pages.
- Peer reviewers identity and credentials - All peer reviewers are required to disclose their full name. Peer reviewers must be either fellows of the NZAMM, or another relevant specialist.
- Editing users’ conflicts of interest - Conflict of interest statements are mandatory on the user pages of the Lead and Deputy editors, and encouraged for all other editing users.
- Administrators’ identity - Public disclosure of identity is mandatory for the Lead and Deputy Editors.
