ACL Injury

From WikiMSK

Revision as of 20:17, 17 June 2020 by Jeremy (talk | contribs) (based off my presentation)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Once torn, it doesn’t heal Reconstruction does not make it normal – posttraumatic osteoarthritis can occur regardless of management

ACL Surgery

Surgical vs non-surgical management

[1]

  • RCT of 121 “young active adults”
  • Rehab (plus delayed surgery if needed) vs rehab plus early surgery
  • 5 year follow up: no differences in ability to return to sport, knee function, or rate of meniscal injury
  • 50% crossover (50% in rehab group crossed over to surgery)
  • Take-away: 50% can be managed non-operatively
  • In my opinion we don’t know if those other 50% eventually managed operatively would have better outcomes than sham surgery

Subsequent OA and Meniscal Tears

[2]

  • Metanalysis 2019, comparing surgery vs non-surgical treatment with 10 year follow up
  • Patient reported outcomes the same
  • Higher rate of radiographic knee OA
  • Lower rate of secondary meniscal injury and meniscal surgery
  • Reduced laxity
  • Significant methodological flaws in the included studies and heterogeneity

Copers vs non-copers

[3]

  • Copers – use neuro-musculo-skeletal strategies to dynamically stabilise their ACL-deficient knee even with pivoting
  • Non-copers – knee instability, higher rates of surgery
  • Not possible to classify this early on
  • in one study 70% of those initially classified as non-copers, were copers after 1 year of non-operative management. And only 60% of potential copers were true copers.

ACL Reconstruction

  • Indications??
    • Recurrent instability
    • Associated tear when amenable to repair
    • Associated ligament injury especially posterolateral corner
    • Professional and elite players
    • High-risk occupation (where instability could cause harm)
    • ?Adolescents, risk of instability, ?protect against future meniscal and chondral damage.
  • Delay surgery until normal range of motion, effusion largely resolved and able to walk comfortably (to reduce risk of athrofibrosis i.e. stiffness)

ACL Graft Selection

  • Bone-Patella-Bone
    • possible earlier graft fixation and stability due to included portion of bone
    • anterior knee pain up to 1 year
    • possible higher rate of OA.
  • Hamstring
    • Initial fixation may be slower and weaker (no bone), but quadruple strand is stronger than B-P-B
    • Donor site pain resolves by 3 months
    • hamstring strength normal by 12 months.
  • Other: Allografts, quadriceps graft,

ACL Postoperative

[4] Graft re-rupture (from surgical failure or re-trauma) Outcomes worse for revision ACL repair Increased risk tear contralateral knee – 7% cumulative incidence 5770 reconstructed knees – 60% returned to pre-injury level, and 44% returned to competitive sport. Professional players – 90% return to play by 12 months, sensible?? Shorter careers.

Unknown Unknowns

[5] Cultural norms in professional sport and other areas ?Uncertainty of non-operative treatment Loss of option of early ACL repair ACL-deficient sport ?future meniscal and cartilage injury What is success, return to pivoting sport? What is in the athlete’s best interest? “Doing nothing” is hard

Rehabilitation for Athletes

[6]

  1. Protection and controlled mobilisation
  2. Controlled training
  3. More intensive training
  4. Return to play (many months)
  1. Frobel R et al, Treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tear: five year outcome of randomised trial BMJ 2013;346:f232
  2. Lien-Iversen, T., Morgan, D. B., Jensen, C., Risberg, M. A., Engebretsen, L., & Viberg, B. (2019). Does surgery reduce knee osteoarthritis, meniscal injury and subsequent complications compared with non-surgery after ACL rupture with at least 10 years follow-up? A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, bjsports–2019–100765.
  3. Moksnes, H., Snyder-Mackler, L., & Risberg, M. A. (2008). Individuals With an Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knee Classified as Noncopers May Be Candidates for Nonsurgical Rehabilitation. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 38(10), 586–595. doi:10.2519/jospt.2008.2750 
  4.  Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA. Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. Br J Sports Med 2011;45:596-606.
  5. Weiler, R. (2015). Unknown unknowns and lessons from non-operative rehabilitation and return to play of a complete anterior cruciate ligament injury in English Premier League football. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(5), 261–262. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2015-095141
  6. Bizzini, M., Hancock, D., & Impellizzeri, F. (2012). Suggestions From the Field for Return to Sports Participation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Soccer. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 42(4), 304–312. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.4005