Idiopathic Scoliosis

From WikiMSK

Written by: Dr Jeremy Steinberg – created: 22 July 2021; last modified: 11 November 2023

This article is still missing information.
Radiographic scoliotic measurements
Idiopathic Scoliosis
Definition 3D spinal deformity with at least 10° of curvature in the coronal plane.
Epidemiology 2-4% of adolescents
Pathophysiology Asymmetrical vertebral gorwth
Classification Infantile, Juvenile, Adolescent, Adult.
Clinical Features Truncal asymmetry noted by parents or caregivers or as an incidental finding on imaging, with or without pain. Positive Adam's test on exam.
Diagnosis Cobb angle greater than 10° and exclusion of other causes.
Tests Whole spine radiographs
DDX neuromuscular, syndromic, congenital, degenerative, non-structural.
Treatment monitoring, bracing, surgery.
Prognosis depends on curve magnitude and progression.

Idiopathic Scoliosis is a three dimensional spinal deformity in frontal, sagittal, and axial planes. It is defined as a coronal spinal curvature of at least 10° with rotation of the vertebral bodies and has unknown aetiology.


Idiopathic scoliosis is the most common structural spinal deformity in children and adolescents. It affects about 2-3% of adolescents, but the prevalence is dependent on the cut-off point chosen, and is only 0.1-0.3% for curvatures greater than 30°.

The most common scoliosis is a thoracic curve to the right side. The primary age of onset is 10 to 15 years.

With small curves there is an equal prevalence of affected males and females. However there is a female predominance with increasing curve magnitude.

In the infantile form, which presents at 0-3 years of age, there is a predominance in males at 3:2. At 3-6 the female to male ratio is 1:1; at 3-10 it is 2:1 to 4:1; at 10 years the ratio is 8:1.


The exact aetiology is unknown. There appears to be asymmetrical growth of anterior column of the vertebrae with resulting tethering of the posterior elements. The underlying cause for this imbalance of growth is unknown.

There are thought to be genetic factors controlling for scoliosis. This has been indicated by population and twin studies. However no specific gene or genes have been found. There is variable expression and so environmental factors also contribute to the pathogenesis.

There has been interesting research done on platelets as both skeletal muscle and platelets have myosin/actin contractile systems. There is an association with scoliosis and a defective contractile system in platelets.

Calmodulin and melatonin interact with the actin/myosin system with calmodulin regulating calcium influx from the sacroplasmic reticulum and melatonin binding to calmodulin as an antagonist. Research has suggested abnormal levels of these substances in scoliotic individuals.

Clinical Assessment

Red Flags
  • Left thoracic curve
  • Apical kyphosis
  • Rapid curve progression
  • Structural abnormalities such as a hemivertebra
  • Pathological reflexes, radicular pain, foot deformities


  • Family history of spinal deformities or spinal disease
  • Age
  • Sexual maturity: Asking about age of menarche and secondary sex characteristics can help ascertain the level of skeletal maturation. Curve progression is less common after the onset of menarche.
  • Pain: Most adolescents are asymptomatic. However 25% of patients have back pain as their initial presentation, and another 9% develop pain on follow up.[1] Signs of underlying pathology include constant pain, night pain, and radicular pain.
  • Neurological symptoms: Enquire about bladder or bowel dysfunction, as well as intellectual or motor delay
  • Previous illnesses or trauma
  • Psychological distress

General Physical Examination

  • Height: Serial heights helps to determine the peak growth spurt which is a predictor of the degree of curve progression. To calculate this you need to have at least 3 lots of 6 monthly regular measurements. In girls, this value is 9cm / year and peak height velocity occurs on average at 12 years of chronological age. In males it is 10cm / year and occurs on average at 14 years. The total duration of the growth spurt is about 2.5 to 3 years.
  • Stage of sexual maturity: Assess the stage of sexual maturity using the Tanner stage.
  • Skin and musculoskeletal system: Look for cafe au lait spots, subcutaneous nodules, and axillary freckling of neurofibromatosis; hair patches or dimples of spinal dysraphisms; hypermobility of Marfan and Ehlers-Danlos.
  • Pelvic asymmetry: Assess for pelvic malalignment and leg length discrepancies as causes of pseudoscoliosis
  • Skin e.g. café-au-lait spots and subcutaneous nodules (neurofibromatosis).
  • Neurological examination: Look for pes cavus, limb weakness, reflex asymmetry or absence including cutaneous abdominal reflexes. Patellar and/or Achilles hyperreflexia should raise suspicion of a non-idiopathic cause of scoliosis.
Figure 1. Adam's test with a scoliometer[2]

Spinal Examination

The patient should stand barefoot, with their legs straight, and with an uncovered back that is accessible to the examiner. Boys should be in underwear and shorts, and girls should be in underwear and a bra.

From behind observe the following:

  • Shoulder heights
  • Scapula heights
  • Iliac crest heights
  • Plumb line: drop a plumb line from the C7 spinous process. This should fall between the intergluteal cleft. If not then measure the distance from the plumb line to the intergluteal cleft.
  • Symmetry of the triangular space between the medial aspect of each arm with the adjacent trunk.
  • Adam's test: The patient stands and bends forward at the waist with the head as low as possible without flexing the knees until the shoulders are at hip height while holding their arms hanging straight down with palms together in a prayer position. The examiner assesses for symmetry of the back from behind and beside the patient while looking for any back or rib cage abnormalities such as a rib hump. See video on Adams test
  • Seated Adam's test: Non-structural causes can be assessed by examining the patient sitting on the bed and bending forward. Structural scoliosis persists in this position, while a non-structural scoliosis (e.g. due to leg length discrepancy) disappears.
  • Measurement of trunk rotation angle: Scoliometer use is ideal but not necessary in primary care. This is an instrument that is placed on the back during the Adams test and is used to provide an objective measure of the curve. A rotation of 5° correlates with a 20° Cobb angle.
  • Assess the scoliotic curve direction. 90% of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves are right thoracic, left lumbar curves, i.e. the curve is convex towards the right. Left thoracic curves have a higher association with underlying pathology.

From the side observe the following:

  • Rounded shoulders
  • Abdominal prominence due to poor muscular tone

From the front observe the following:

  • Pectus excavatum or carinatum (Marfan)
  • Asymmetry of breast development

Differential Diagnosis

Child and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis accounts for approximately 80% of cases. It is a diagnosis of exclusion and is differentiated from neuromuscular and congenital scoliosis. In adults degenerative scoliosis is a consideration. Also non-structural causes such as leg-length discrepancy occurs.

Scoliosis Differential Diagnoses
  • Idiopathic Scoliosis
  • Neuromuscular Scoliosis: lower or upper motor neuron diseases, myopathies
  • Syndromic Scoliosis: Marfan, Ehlers-Danlos, osteogenesis imperfecta, neurofibromatosis, osteochondrodysplasia
  • Congenital Scoliosis: vertebral and extraverterbral disorders
  • Adult Degenerative Scoliosis
  • Non-Structural Scoliosis
  • Other: rheumatoid diseases, trauma, bone tumours.


Figure 2: Cobb Angle Measurement: The above spine has two offsetting curves, denoted by green and red vertebral bodies. A: line along superior endplate of highest vertebral body, B: line along inferior endplate of lowest vertebral body. C: lines extended forming the Cobb angle. D: for the smaller green curve perpendicular lines are drawn towards each other, with the intersection of these perpendiculars forming the Cobb angle.[3]
Figure 3: Cobb angle and Central Sacral Vertical Line (CSVL) measurements. The CSVL is constructed on frontal films as a line connecting the top of the iliac crests, and a second line drawn perpendicular to the first bisecting the sacrum.[4]

Initial radiological investigations should include whole spine radiographs from the cranium to the pelvis, including anteroposterior (or posteroanterior which dramatically reduces radiation) and lateral views.

The patient should be standing barefoot with a relaxed trunk to avoid compensating positions. If the patient has difficulty standing then they can be imaged in a semi-sitting position to maintain the effect of gravity on the curves.

If surgery is being considered, then a full length posteroanterior film is often taken of the patient side bending to the right and left. This assesses curve flexibility.

Cobb Angle

The magnitude of a scoliotic curve is determined by the Cobb angle. To measure the Cobb angle first identify the "end vertebra" which are the top and bottom-most vertebral bodies in the curve.

Lines are then drawn along the superior endplate of the highest vertebral body and inferior endplate of the lowest vertebral body. The lines are extended until they intersect, and the angle that forms is the Cobb angle.

In smaller curves the angle may be too small to allow intersection using the above method. In that situation extend the lines a short distance, then draw perpendicular lines from each line towards the other line. The angle that forms from the intersection of the perpendiculars is the Cobb angle.

Coronal and Sagittal Balance

Alignment is measured in both the coronal and sagittal planes using a plumb line starting at the base of C7. This needs to be performed on erect full-length spine radiographs without lateral bending

In a neutral coronal balance the C7 plumb line lies within 2cm of the centre of the sacrum. When the C7 plumb line sits to the left of the sacrum there is a negative coronal balance, when it sits to the right there is a positive coronal balance. In the coronal plane the spine should have less than 10° of curvature. This relates to the central sacral vertical line (CSVL), see figure 3. The CSVL is a line constructed on frontal films of the spine and pelvis to measure coronal balance, drawn as follows:

  1. a line connecting the top of the iliac crests is drawn
  2. a second line is drawn perpendicular to the first, which bisects the sacrum[4]

In neutral sagittal balance the C7 plumb line lies within 2cm of the posterior-superior corner of S1. If the C7 plumb line lies anterior to S1 there is a positive sagittal balance, and if it lies posterior to S1 there is a negative sagittal balance. There is a wide range of normal curves in the sagittal plane. The thoracic kyphosis ranges from 10° to 60°, while the lumbar lordosis ranges from 20° to 60°. A positive sagittal balance is associated with worse pain and disability.

Miscellaneous Features

Figure 6: Illustration of a well seated L5 vertebral body as the intercristal line bisects the curve above the L4/5 disc space, the obliquity of the L3 and L4 bodies from the horizontal, and the lateral olisthesis between two adjacent lumbar vertebrae that can occur in adult scoliosis.

A low interiliac line, where the line falls below the fourth lumbar disc space, is referred to as a poorly seated L5. In this setting there is a high percentage of apical vertebral rotation in combination with lateral translatory vertebral body shifts (olisthesis) at the lower end of the curve.[5] This pattern be a risk factor for the development of annular tears. See figure 6.

Skeletal Maturity

Including the iliac crests allows not only measurement of the pelvic tilt but also bone maturity by Risser's sign. Risser's sign refers to the appearance of the iliac apophysis on the pelvis. The stages represents the state of ossification of the iliac crests, which begins at the ASIS and progresses back towards the PSIS.

  • Stage 0: no ossification centre at the level of iliac crest apophysis
  • Stage 1: apophysis under 25% of the iliac crest
  • Stage 2: apophysis over 25-50% of the iliac crest
  • Stage 3: apophysis over 50-75% of the iliac crest
  • Stage 4: apophysis over >75% of the iliac crest
  • Stage 5: complete ossification and fusion of the iliac crest apophysis

The Risser sign isn't perfect. It correlates differently in boys and girls with skeletal maturity, and typically appears after the peak height velocity. Grade 5 may not match the completion of vertebral growth. Also stage 0 and stage 5 appear similar.

If there are doubts regarding skeletal maturity then request a bone age x-ray of the left hand and wrist. The scoring of the metacarpals and phalanges are more closely related to scoliosis progression than Tanner stage and Risser sign. Assessment of elbow maturation is another method and is more accurate than hand maturation.[6]

Radiation Dose

Whole spine radiographs are equivalent to 100 chest x-rays and there is an increased risk of death from breast cancer compared to the general population. The following precautions should be taken

  • Wherever possible radiographs should be done form a posteroanterior projection which reduces the radiation dose to the breasts by 70-80%.
  • Gonadal protection in both sexes
  • In analogue equipment provide breast protection. This isn't necessary with digital equipment.

High Tech Imaging

MRI is warranted if there is a suspicion of an underlying disease such as in the presence of a left thoracic curve or abnormal neurological findings. MRI can identify pathology such as tumours, syrinx, and Chiari malformations.


Age Based Classification

The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) classifies idiopathic scoliosis based on age

  1. Infantile (IIS): manifests between birth and 3 years of age. It affects more boys than girls, and is related to the supine position of the baby. 70-90% resolve spontaneously
  2. Juvenile (JIS): manifests between 3 and 10 years of age. The incidence is equal in boys and girls, and has the same progression and AIS.
  3. Adolescent (AIS): manifests between 10 years and skeletal maturity. It is more common in women (70%)
  4. Adult: over 18 years: The adult form is differentiated from primary degenerative scoliosis. The adult idiopathic type is an idiopathic scoliosis that was present at the end of growth and has progressive secondary degenerative changes.

Radiological Classification

The SRS classifies a curve as thoracic if the apex is at the T2 to T11/12 disc, thoracolumbar if the apex is at T12 or L1, and lumbar if the apex is at the L1/2 to L4 disc.

King (1983)[7] and Lenke (2001)[8] are other classification systems. Both of these classification schemes use the Cobb angles (see figure 2). There is a problem with reliability of grading systems, but Lenke is thought to have better reliability and reproducibility.[9]

The Lenke system uses the vertebral level and number of curves to classify the scoliosis into six major types. It is a very complex system and the learner is encouraged to read through the original publication.

Lenke Characteristic Curve Patterns
Curve Type
Curve Proximal Thoracic Main Thoracic Thoracolumbar / Lumbar Curve Type Prevalence % (N) [10]
1 Non-structural Structural (major*) Non-structural Main thoracic (MT) 51% (309)
2 Structural Structural (major*) Non-structural Double thoracic (DT) 20% (118)
3 Non-structural Structural (major*) Structural Double major (DM) 11% (69)
4 Structural Structural (major*) Structural Triple major (TM) 3% (19)
5 Non-structural Non-structural Structural (major*) Thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) 12% (74)
6 Non-structural Structural Structural (major*) Thoracolumbar/lumbar, main thoracic (TL/L-MT) 3% (17)
*Major = largest Cobb measurement, always structural Minor = all other curves with structural criteria applied
Structural Criteria (minor curves) Location of Apex (SRS definition)
Proximal thoracic: - side bending Cobb ≥ 20°

- T2 - T5 kyphosis ≥ +20°

Curve: - thoracic


- lumbar

Main thoracic: - side bending Cobb ≥ 20°

- T10 - L2 kyphosis ≥ +20°

Apex: - T2/T11-12 disc

- L1/2 disc - L4

TL/L: - side bending Cobb ≥ 20°

- T10 - L2 kyphosis ≥ +20°

Lumbar Spine Modifiers
Lumbar Spine Modifier Thoracic Sagittal Profile T6-T12
CSVL to lumbar apex
A CSVL between pedicles - hypo < 19°
B CSVL touches apical body(ies) N normal 10° - 40°
C CSVL completely medial + hyper > 40°
Curve Type (1-6) + Lumbar Spine Modifier (A, B, or C) + Thoracic Sagittal Modifier (-, N, or +)

A curve is described as being structural (relatively fixed) or non-structural (flexible). This is determined by looking at the degree of change of Cobb angle on the supine anteroposterior side-bending radiographs. If the Cobb angle on the side bending film is greater than 25° then the curve is considered structural.

Compensatory minor curves help to correct the asymmetry that is created by the primary curve. The caudal lumbar spine is the last resort of the spinal column to provide for compensatory correction. Lumbar deformity is important in determining overall spinal balance and impacts on the success of surgical correction. This is what the "lumbar spine modifier" refers to in Lenke's system.

There are three lumbar spine modifiers classified as A, B, and C. These depend on the relationship of the central sacral vertebral line (CSVL) to the apex of the lumbar spine (see figure 3). The stable vertebra is the most proximal lower thoracic or lumbar vertebra in the curve most closely bisected by the CSVL. If a disc is most closely bisected then choose the next caudad vertebra as the stable one. Trunk shift is the distance between the C7 plumb line and the CSVL.

Most proximal lower thoracic or lumbar vertebra most closely bisected by CSVL. If a disc is most closely bisected, then choose next caudad vertebra as stable.

The main downside to using the Cobb angle for classification is that it neglects the fact that scoliosis is a 3-dimensional deformity, not simply coronal. It includes sagittal and rotational abnormalities. The Lenke classification therefore adds a descriptor of the thoracic sagittal profile between T5 and T12. They are subdivided on the basis of an assumed normal value called N (20 – 40o). Three types are described: hypokyphosis [- (<10o)], normal [N (10 – 40o)] and hyperkyphosis [+ (>40o)].

In a series of 606 patients with idiopathic adolescent scoliosis, the five most common curve types are 1AN, 1BN, 2AN, 5CN, and 1CN.[10]

Natural History and Curve Progression Risk

Long Term Natural History

The initial longitudinal research, published in 1968, painted a grim picture outlining high rates of progression of the deformity, the development of severe disabling back pain, and cardiopulmonary dysfunction. This research while initially influential, has long since thought to be highly flawed. They did not differentiate between idiopathic scoliosis and other forms (e.g. congenital, neuromuscular, etc), there were many cases lost to follow up, there was no control group, the numbers were small and findings were statistically insignificant, and the outcome measures were all based on questionnaires rather than objective assessment.[11][12]

Subsequent research found much less bleak outcomes for idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. One prospective case series followed up 133 patients over an average of 40.5 years (range 31-53 years). 68% of adolescent idiopathic curvatures progressed past skeletal maturity. [13]

  • Thoracic curves that were greater than 50° progressed at an average rate of 1° per year. Thoracic curves under 30° did not progress.
  • Thoracolumbar curves progressed at 0.5° per year
  • Lumbar curves progressed at 0.24° per year.

The long term health consequences of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis was evaluated in a 50 year follow up study of 117 untreated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and compared them to controls. The authors found that while there was an increased risk of back pain (61% vs 35% in controls), there was no increased rate of mortality, nor any increased rate of cardiac or pulmonary disease. However in those with thoracic curves of more than 100° there was an increased risk of death from right heart failure.[14]

There is a slightly greater incidence of back pain in those with thoracolumbar or lumbar curves, especially those with translatory shifts at the lower end of the curve.[14][15] Translatory shifts on radiographs have been correlated with backache and with radicular thigh pain.[16] In this setting, the apical vertebral rotation leads to hypertrophy and subluxation of the facet joints in the concavity of the lumbar curve. This can narrow the neural foramen between the adjacent pedicles leading to nerve root irritation. Radicular anterior thigh pain tends to occur on the side of the concavity of the major curve and indicates compression of L2, L3, or L4 nerve roots. Radicular buttock and lower limb pain tends to occur on the side of the convexity of the curve implicating compression of L5 and S1 nerve roots.

There are often negative psychological effects with scoliosis, but these are better tolerated by middle-aged patients than teenagers.[17] Adolescents may be particularly unhappy about rib prominence. There is no correlation between psychological distress and the location and magnitude of curvature. [18]

Risk Factors of Curve Progression in Scoliosis[6]

The determinants of progression are the age and sex of the individual, the stage of pubertal development, the growth potential, the curve pattern and grade at the time of diagnosis.

Risk factor of progression Comment
Age The younger the age at diagnosis, the greater the possibility of progression at the onset of the adolescent growth spurt
Sex Progression is more common in girls
Menarche Progression is less likely in the post-menarche period
Remaining skeletal growth The greater the skeletal immaturity, the greater the risk of progression.
Curve pattern Double curves have a higher risk of progression compared to single curves. Left thoracic curves (convex towards the left) are also more likely to progress.
Curve magnitude Greater curves have a higher risk of progression. Curves between 50-70° are most likely to progress in adulthood.
Curve rotation Apical vertebral rotation of greater than 33% is associated with progression in adulthood. [19]

The remaining skeletal growth is determined by rate of growth, age of telarche and menarche, Tanner's stage, Risser's sign, and/or bone age. It should take into account that the primary growth spurt occurs 6-12 months before menarche in Tanner 3 at an average age of 12 in girls, and in Tanner 4 at an average age of 14 in boys.

Risk Percentage of Progression According to Cobb Angle, Sex, and Age[20]
Initial Curve Girls 10-12 years Girls 13-15 years Girls >15 years Boys
<19° 25% 1% <1% 3%
20-29° 60% 40% 10% 6%
30-56° 90% 70% 30%
>60° 100% 90%



Standard management options include observation, bracing, and surgery. Considerations include skeletal maturity and the grade of the curve. Generally patients are referred to a specialist clinic.

Management According to Skeletal Maturity

Skeletal immaturity

  • <25º: physical examination and radiographs every 4-6 months.
  • 25º-40º: bracing.
  • > 40º or progression despite the orthosis: should consider surgery.

Intermediate skeletal maturity

  • <20º: clinical observation.
  • 20º-30º: radiographs every 6-9 months.
  • > 30º: radiographs strictly every 6 months.
  • > 45 °: surgery should be considered.

Skeletal maturity

  • <40º: unspecified.
  • > 40º: annual evaluation.
  • ≥ 50º or curve in progression: surgery.
Management According to Grade of the Curve[21]
Curve Therapy
10-25° observation every 6 months until skeletally mature including sequential photographs, sitting height.
25-30° Bracing
30-40° Bracing
> 40° Surgery in skeletally immature patients
> 50° Surgery in skeletally mature patients.

Restrictive lung disease may become a serious health issue with thoracic curves larger than 70°. Patients may also have obstructive lung disease.


Bracing is a controversial treatment modality, with divergent practices across specialist clinics. The results from research has been mixed. Bracing has been found to cause significant psychological distress unless the patient is well supported by the family.[22]

Physical Therapy

There is no scientific evidence that any form of manual therapy, manipulation, electrical stimulation, or corrective exercises can slow or stop the progression of scoliosis. There are a variety of scoliosis physical therapy philosophies around the world.


The goal of surgery is prevention of curve progression and correction of the deformity. It usually involves curve correction and spinal instrumentation and fusion. The lower lumbar motion segments tend to be left unfused.

The case for surgical correction amounts to theoretically reducing the chance of future consequences of curve progression, however this assumption has not been properly tested and there are a lack of high quality controlled trials. The majority of published literature on scoliosis has been generated by surgeons, and the likely bias implicit in this should be kept in mind.

See Also


  1. Ramirez N, Johnston CE, Browne RH. The prevalence of back pain in children who have idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:364-8.
  2. Ma, Hsuan-Hsiao et al. “Application of two-parameter scoliometer values for predicting scoliotic Cobb angle.” Biomedical engineering online vol. 16,1 136. 4 Dec. 2017, doi:10.1186/s12938-017-0427-7
  3. Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Available from
  4. 4.0 4.1 Dr Sachintha Hapugoda and Assoc Prof Frank Gaillard et al. Central sacral vertical line.
  5. Schwab FJ, Smith VA, Biserni M, et al. Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis. Spine 2002; 27:387-92
  6. 6.0 6.1 Altaf F, Gibson A, Dannawi Z, Noordeen H. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. BMJ. 2013 Apr 30;346:f2508. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2508. PMID: 23633006.
  7. King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS, et al. The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983; 65:1302-13
  8. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A:1169-81. DOI:
  9. Ogon M, Giesinger K, Behensky H, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Lenke's new scoliosis classification system. Spine 2002; 27:858-62.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Lenke LG, Betz RR, Clements D, et al. Curve prevalence of a new classification of operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: does classification correlate with treatment? Spine 2002; 27:604-11.
  11. Nachemson A. A long term follow-up study of non-treated scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand 1968; 39:466-76.
  12. Nilsonne U, Lundgren KD. Long-term prognosis in idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand 1968; 39:456-65.
  13. Weinstein SL, Ponseti IV. Curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983;65:447-55.
  14. 14.0 14.1 Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Spratt KF, Peterson KK, Spoonamore MJ, Ponseti IV. Health and function of patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis: a 50-year natural history study. JAMA. 2003 Feb 5;289(5):559-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.5.559. PMID: 12578488.
  15. Weinstein S. In view of the long term results in untreated patients, can surgery be justified? Proceedings of the Eighth Zorab Scoliosis Symposium. London, 1988:83-91
  16. Perennou D, Marcelli C, Herisson C, et al. Adult lumbar scoliosis. Epidemiologic aspects in a low-back pain population. Spine 1994; 19:123-8.
  17. Weinstein SL, Zavala DC, Ponseti IV. Idiopathic scoliosis: long-term follow-up and prognosis in untreated patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981; 63:702-12.
  18. Eliason MJ, Richman LC. Psychological effects of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1984; 5:169-72.
  19. Weinstein SL. Natural history. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Dec 15;24(24):2592-600. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199912150-00006. PMID: 10635522.
  20. Bueche MJ. Scoliosis and kyphosis. Neinstein LS, Gordon CM, Katzman DK, Rosen D, et al, eds. Adolescent Health Care: a practical guide. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.Pages.235-42
  21. Bueche MJ. Scoliosis and kyphosis. En: Neinstein LS, Gordon CM, Katzman DK, Rosen D, et al, eds. Adolescent Health Care: a practical guide. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.Págs.235-42.
  22. Boos, Norbert, and M Aebi. Spinal disorders : fundamentals of diagnosis and treatment. Berlin New York: Springer, 2008.
  • Comité Nacional de Adolescencia SAP, et al. Consenso de escoliosis idiopática del adolescente [Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis]. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2016 Dec 1;114(6):585-594. Spanish. doi: 10.5546/aap.2016.585. PMID: 27869435.

Literature Review