Myotendinous Junction

From WikiMSK

Revision as of 18:40, 9 August 2021 by Jeremy (talk | contribs)

This article is a stub.

The myotendinous junction (MTJ) is the interface between muscle and tendon. The MTJ allows force that is generated by the muscle to be transmitted from the muscle filaments to the collagen fibres of the adjoining tendon. See also about entheses, the connection between tendon/ligament and bone.

Muscle and Tendon/Ligament Structure Overview

Muscles

Synovial joints are acted upon by muscles which are mostly composed of water, proteins, salts, minerals, fat, and carbohydrates. The protein content is made up of various collagens to form their membranes; namely types I, III, IV, and V. The membranes are the endomysium, perimysium, and epimysium.

Sarcomeres are the contractile units and are made up of myosin, actin, and titin. Sarcomeres form myofibres, which are the structural contractile unit of the muscle. Myofibres form muscle fascicles, which are in turn surrounded by perimysium. Muscle fascicles form the whole muscle belly.

Cellularly, a single muscle cell is called a myocyte.

Tendons and Ligaments

Tendons transmit forces between muscles and bones. Ligaments aid in maintaining physiological joint alignment. Tendons and ligaments are made up of water, collagen type I, elastin, and proteoglycans.

The basic structural unit of ligaments and tendons are the tropocollagen molecules that aggregate and form the collagen fibril. Fibrils come together to produce various structures of increasing complexity: sub-fascicles, fascicles, tertiary fibre bundle, and the whole tendon/ligament.

The subunits of tendons are surrounded by endotenon membranes, and that of ligaments by endoligament membranes. The epitenon/epiligament is for the whole tendon/ligament.

Cellularly there are fibroblasts for ligaments, and tenocytes for tendons. These cells are arranged in rows between the collagen fibres.

Myotendinous Junction Structure and Function

The musculoskeletal system as a whole has both hard and soft tissues. The interfaces between these tissues have gradients in order to reduce stress concentrations at the junction sites. The interfaces between tendons/ligaments and bone are called entheses, while the interfaces between tendons and muscles are called myotendinous junctions (MTJ).

The MTJ allows a gradual transition between the stiff tendon and the softer muscle. The main difference to the enthesis, is that the MTJ connects a mostly cellular tissue (the muscle), to a mostly extra-cellular matrix based tissue (the tendon).

Finger-like Processes

The MTJ has been described as having conical like finger projections that interdigitate with the tendon extracellular matrix with invaginations and evaginations of the sarcolemma. The finger-like processes might have various functions.

  1. It increases the surface area by 10-20 times compared to a planar surface, and in doing so decreases stress.
  2. It also positions the membranes at very low angles relative to the applied stress, and in doing so it causes the membranes to be primarily subjected to shear stress. The adhesion strength is theoretically much higher during shear loading compared to tension loading.

The fingers are not seen in 3D reconstruction, as the fingers are a reflection of the way the tissue is cut. In 3D the structures may be more suitably named ridge-like protrusions and furrow-like indentations. The tendon tissue forms the ridge-like protrusions, and the myofibrils connect to the tendon tissue through these protrusions. The sarcomeres run parallel to the ridge-like protrusions of the tendon.[1]

Tendinous portion

The tendinous portion is made up of multidirectional collagen fibres. In the tendon the force is longitudinal hence orientation is also longitudinal here. However close to the muscle the force can be in many directions. This allows force transmission laterally via the endomysium to adjacent myofibres.

Muscle portion

As the sarcomeres extend towards the MTJ, they appear to change direction, with the longitudinal axis of the sarcomere becoming parallel with the major axis of the finger-like processes, allowing force transmission via shear as above. There is a final Z-line from the muscle fibre at the MTJ. The myofilaments extend from the final Z-line to merge with the tendon tissue by anchoring from the muscle cytoskeleton to the tendon extracellular matrix. The myofilaments of the terminal sarcomeres insert into the plasma membrane through thin filaments only (likely actin).

Clinical Applications

Adaptation

The MTJ is a dynamic structure that can adapt to mechanical stimuli. In rats that exercise regularly there are more branches from the finger-like processes compared to non-exercising rats. The angulation of the processes relative to the longitudinal direction also increased.[2]

Aging

In older rats, the finger-like processes are more irregular.[3]

In atrophied muscle the contact area between muscle and tendon is reduced.[4]

Injury

Injuries to the MTJ are common. Failure occurs either at the muscle-tendon junction or in the muscle belly itself. Injuries include partial tears and complete ruptures.

References

  1. โ†‘ Knudsen AB, Larsen M, Mackey AL, Hjort M, Hansen KK, Qvortrup K, Kjaer M, Krogsgaard MR. The human myotendinous junction: an ultrastructural and 3D analysis study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Feb;25(1):e116-23. doi: 10.1111/sms.12221. Epub 2014 Apr 10. PMID: 24716465.
  2. โ†‘ Kojima H, Sakuma E, Mabuchi Y, Mizutani J, Horiuchi O, Wada I, Horiba M, Yamashita Y, Herbert DC, Soji T, Otsuka T. Ultrastructural changes at the myotendinous junction induced by exercise. J Orthop Sci 2008: 13 (3): 233โ€“239
  3. โ†‘ Ciena AP, Yokomizo De Almeida SR, De Sousa Bolina C, De Sousa Bolina-Matos R, Grassi Rici RE, Pereira Da Silva MC, Miglino MA, Watanabe IS. Ultrastructural features of the myotendinous junction of the sternomastoid muscle in Wistar rats: from newborn to aging. Microsc Res Tech 2012: 75 (9): 1292โ€“1296.
  4. โ†‘ de Palma L, Marinelli M, Bertoni-Freddari C. Involvement of the muscle-tendon junction in skeletal muscle atrophy: an ultrastructural study. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2011: 52 (1): 105โ€“109.